DIPLOMATIC SECURITY
Worldwide Security Upgrades- The recommendation includes a total of
$594,373,000 for Worldwide Security Upgrades. The Committee recommendations are
displayed in the following table:
WORLDWIDE SECURITY UPGRADES
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committee recommendation
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ongoing Security Activities:
Additional Consular Officers 22,572
Guards/Worldwide Protection 137,046
Physical Security Equipment 18,912
Technical Support/Infrastructure 68,932
Information/Systems Security 51,825
Armored Vehicles 10,536
Personnel/Training 119,780
Chemical/Biological Program 4,057
Radio Program 7,413
Perimeter Security Enhancements 70,000
TOPOFF II 3,000
Subtotal, Ongoing Security Activities 514,073
New Programs:
Secure Operations 52,000
National Information Assurance Certification and Accreditation Process 28,300
Subtotal, New Programs 80,300
Subtotal, Worldwide Security Upgrades 594,373
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Some of the Committee recommendations displayed in the table are described in
more detail in the following paragraphs.
Marine Security Guard [MSG] Program.--During the 19th century, the
United States Navy was frequently called upon to protect American lives and
property in remote parts of the world. Marine detachments took part in these
operations and, on occasion, were called upon to protect U.S. diplomatic
missions. The first such instance took place in 1835, when four marines from the
U.S.S. Brandywine were assigned to protect the U.S. Consulate in Lima,
Peru. The followng year, a single Marine was permanently detailed to this task.
Following this, legation guard detachments were stationed at various times in
Tokyo, Seoul, and Managua. Over time, it became clear that civilian guards were
unable to maintain adequate security at overseas missions, and the Department
accordingly turned to the United States Armed Forces. Finally, on December 15,
1948, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of the Navy signed a memorandum
of agreement which established the present Marine Security Guard program. Today
Marines are assigned to Foreign Service posts throughout the world.
After that, the mission of the Marine Security Guard [MSG] detachments
assigned to U.S. diplomatic facilities evolved from one of protecting people to
one of protecting information. The reasons why this evolution was necessary
have, in recent years, been overcome by technologies that assure the integrity
of sensitive information. Terrorists have proven their ability to plan and
execute sophisticated attacks such as those carried out in Dar Es Salaam,
Tanzania and Nairobi, Kenya in 1998, New York, Washington, and Pennsylvania in
2001, and Riyadh, Saudi Arabia in 2003. In this new global security environment,
the primary mission of MSG detachments must be to protect embassy personnel. The
Committee commends the Department for its efforts to revise its Memorandum of
Agreement with the Department of Defense as it pertains to the mission of Marine
Corps personnel assigned to U.S. diplomatic posts.
Growth and Planning.--The Department's security program has grown
exponentially over the last 6 years. Since 1999, the Committee has made
$3,132,600,000 available to the Department for non-capital security alone. Also
in that time, the number of Diplomatic Security agents employed by the
Department increased by nearly 73 percent, from 782 to 1,350 personnel. While
some growth was necessary in order for the Department to respond to the emerging
threat of terrorism, growth in the Bureau of Diplomatic Security [DS] followed
no pre-developed model or plan. Until recently, the Bureau made staffing and
resource decisions without the benefit of a comprehensive strategy. The absence
of a strategy made it impossible for the Committee to make informed funding
decisions about the Department's security requirements. The Committee commends
the Assistant Secretary for Diplomatic Security for recognizing this serious
deficiency and for his efforts to build a staffing model that will allow DS to
become the kind of robust, efficient, and dynamic security operation the
Department needs. The Committee received a draft strategy on June 16, 2003, and
is in the process of reviewing it.
The Department's request for Worldwide Security Upgrades for fiscal year 2004
is $97,296,000 above the fiscal year 2003 funding level. Providing such a
substantial increase and locking these funds into specific categories in the
midst of the Assistant Secretary's top-to-bottom review would serve neither the
Department nor the American taxpayers. The recommendation therefore includes the
fiscal year 2003 level for ongoing security activities (with the exception of
perimeter security enhancements, which is addressed in a separate section below)
plus $52,000,000 for the Center for Antiterrorism and Security Training, as
requested by the Department in fiscal year 2003, and $28,300,000 to establish a
program for compliance with the National Information Assurance Certification and
Accreditation process requirements. The Committee would entertain a
reprogramming request, a supplemental request, or a combination of the two to
provide for any needs that may be identified in the course of this internal
review.
TOPOFF III- The Committee commends the Office of the Coordinator for
Counterterrorism for its performance in the Top Officials II [TOPOFF II]
national domestic counterterrorism exercise series. The Department of State,
working in partnership with the Department of Homeland Security, contributed to
the design, development, conduct, and evaluation of this exercise. TOPOFF II was
a two-year effort which included a series of national exercise activities and
culminated in a full-scale, no-notice exercise in May of 2003, in Seattle,
Washington, Chicago, Illinois, and in Vancouver, British Columbia, and Ottawa,
Ontario, Canada. This is the first exercise of its size conducted by the United
States in cooperation with another country. The Committee urges the Secretary of
State to consider inviting Mexico to participate in TOPOFF III. Within the funds
made available for Worldwide Security Upgrades, $3,000,000 is for the
Department's continued participation in the TOPOFF exercise series.
Border Security- The recommendation includes $736,000,000, the full
amount requested, for the Department's border security program. The border
security program, funded from Machine Readable Visa [MRV] fees paid by persons
seeking non-immigrant visas to the United States, is a critical component of the
Department's efforts to assist and protect United States citizens overseas and
safeguard the nation's borders. Disruption of the border security program due to
an MRV fee shortfall must be avoided at all costs. The recommendation therefore
includes language providing for the automatic transfer of funding from the
Diplomatic and Consular Programs account to the account that funds the
Department's Border Security Program in the event of continued MRV fee
shortfalls in fiscal year 2004.
Security Enhancements- At this time of heightened threat to American
posts abroad, the benefits of the security enhancement funds the Committee has
provided to the Department since the Dar Es Salaam and Nairobi bombings in 1998
are being realized. Continual security upgrades to existing properties are as
important as the Department's security construction program. Accordingly, the
Committee recommendation includes $26,600,000 above the request for perimeter
security enhancements under Worldwide Security Upgrades.
Office of Foreign Missions- The Committee continues to believe that
the Office of Foreign Missions [OFM] would be more appropriately aligned with
other management functions within the Department, rather than with the Bureau of
Diplomatic Security [DS]. The Committee therefore directs that OFM be moved out
of DS and placed under the Deputy Secretary of State for Management and
Resources [M].